<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1153 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287204</link>
    <description>Courts will ordinarily not interfere with a show cause notice at an interlocutory stage, and the petition was accordingly dismissed insofar as it sought such relief, leaving the statutory authority to adjudicate the matter on merits. Earlier observations recorded by the High Court were directed to have no bearing on that adjudication and were held not to bind the competent authority, preserving the independence of the merits-based decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:57:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1153 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287204</link>
      <description>Courts will ordinarily not interfere with a show cause notice at an interlocutory stage, and the petition was accordingly dismissed insofar as it sought such relief, leaving the statutory authority to adjudicate the matter on merits. Earlier observations recorded by the High Court were directed to have no bearing on that adjudication and were held not to bind the competent authority, preserving the independence of the merits-based decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>