<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1884 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287187</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata upheld the seizure and confiscation of goods due to ownership dispute and questionable documents but deemed the redemption fine and penalties excessive. After reviewing submissions and records, the tribunal reduced the redemption fine on goods and the vehicle to Rs. 75,000 and Rs. 40,000, respectively, and lowered the penalty to Rs. 10,000. The judgment emphasized the excessive nature of the initial fines and penalties, ultimately disposing of both appeals with revised amounts on 16-11-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1884 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287187</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata upheld the seizure and confiscation of goods due to ownership dispute and questionable documents but deemed the redemption fine and penalties excessive. After reviewing submissions and records, the tribunal reduced the redemption fine on goods and the vehicle to Rs. 75,000 and Rs. 40,000, respectively, and lowered the penalty to Rs. 10,000. The judgment emphasized the excessive nature of the initial fines and penalties, ultimately disposing of both appeals with revised amounts on 16-11-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>