<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1599 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287185</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the reopening of assessment for A.Ys. 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2010-11 based on information from DGIT investigation. The ITAT also confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the profit rate on unverified purchases at 25%, citing lack of evidence supporting purchases from listed hawala parties. The appeals challenging these decisions were dismissed, with the ITAT finding the CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of profit rate reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1599 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287185</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the reopening of assessment for A.Ys. 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2010-11 based on information from DGIT investigation. The ITAT also confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the profit rate on unverified purchases at 25%, citing lack of evidence supporting purchases from listed hawala parties. The appeals challenging these decisions were dismissed, with the ITAT finding the CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of profit rate reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>