<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 60 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394153</link>
    <description>Writ proceedings were disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the statutory appeal against the confiscation order, preserving recourse to the appellate remedy. The respondents indicated no objection to condonation of delay, provided the appeal is filed within the stipulated time, leaving the merits of the confiscation challenge to be considered in the statutory forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 60 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394153</link>
      <description>Writ proceedings were disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the statutory appeal against the confiscation order, preserving recourse to the appellate remedy. The respondents indicated no objection to condonation of delay, provided the appeal is filed within the stipulated time, leaving the merits of the confiscation challenge to be considered in the statutory forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>