<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 49 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21903</link>
    <description>The court held that under Section 64 of the Income-tax Act, the income of the spouse and/or minor child of an individual in a firm where the individual is a partner in a representative capacity, such as karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), cannot be included in the individual&#039;s income assessment. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, answering all questions against the Revenue. No costs were awarded in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 49 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21903</link>
      <description>The court held that under Section 64 of the Income-tax Act, the income of the spouse and/or minor child of an individual in a firm where the individual is a partner in a representative capacity, such as karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), cannot be included in the individual&#039;s income assessment. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, answering all questions against the Revenue. No costs were awarded in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>