<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 44 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394137</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioners, SIM card and Recharge Coupon dealers, to file objections to show cause notices demanding service tax payment. The first respondent was instructed to review the objections and pass orders within four weeks, ensuring procedural fairness. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, emphasizing the opportunity for the petitioners to challenge the notices through objections and a review process by the first respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 44 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394137</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioners, SIM card and Recharge Coupon dealers, to file objections to show cause notices demanding service tax payment. The first respondent was instructed to review the objections and pass orders within four weeks, ensuring procedural fairness. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, emphasizing the opportunity for the petitioners to challenge the notices through objections and a review process by the first respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>