<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 41 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal as time-barred under Section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal held that the appellant filing the appeal on 21.02.2019 was within the stipulated time as there was no conclusive proof of delivery of the adjudication order dispatched via speed post. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits, and the judgment was pronounced on 05.03.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 41 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal as time-barred under Section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal held that the appellant filing the appeal on 21.02.2019 was within the stipulated time as there was no conclusive proof of delivery of the adjudication order dispatched via speed post. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits, and the judgment was pronounced on 05.03.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>