<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394129</link>
    <description>The High Court held that toner cartridges are integral parts of a printer and should be taxed at the same rate as printers, not separately. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the company engaged in the stationary business, which argued for a lower tax rate on H.P. toner and cartridges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394129</link>
      <description>The High Court held that toner cartridges are integral parts of a printer and should be taxed at the same rate as printers, not separately. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the company engaged in the stationary business, which argued for a lower tax rate on H.P. toner and cartridges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>