<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1825 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal vacated the disallowance of Rs. 2,13,382 under Section 14A, ruling in favor of the assessee due to the A.O&#039;s failure to record dissatisfaction with the claim. Regarding the reopening of assessment for alleged bogus purchases, the Tribunal restricted the addition to Rs. 23,125, representing the profit element, thus partly allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1825 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal vacated the disallowance of Rs. 2,13,382 under Section 14A, ruling in favor of the assessee due to the A.O&#039;s failure to record dissatisfaction with the claim. Regarding the reopening of assessment for alleged bogus purchases, the Tribunal restricted the addition to Rs. 23,125, representing the profit element, thus partly allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>