https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287162 A transfer of property made after issuance of notice under SAFEMA Section 6 is statutorily ineffective under Section 11 and cannot be protected as a bona fide purchase for adequate consideration under Section 2(2)(e). The statutory scheme treats such post-notice transfers as invalid and, upon forfeiture, the property vests in the Central Government under Section 7(3). A writ challenge to a possession notice was also held unsustainable where the underlying forfeiture order under Section 7(1) had already attained finality, because the possession notice was only a consequential step and the statutory presumption under Section 8 had not been displaced. en-us Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:25:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287162 A transfer of property made after issuance of notice under SAFEMA Section 6 is statutorily ineffective under Section 11 and cannot be protected as a bona fide purchase for adequate consideration under Section 2(2)(e). The statutory scheme treats such post-notice transfers as invalid and, upon forfeiture, the property vests in the Central Government under Section 7(3). A writ challenge to a possession notice was also held unsustainable where the underlying forfeiture order under Section 7(1) had already attained finality, because the possession notice was only a consequential step and the statutory presumption under Section 8 had not been displaced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287162