https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394128 The court ordered the release of the detained goods upon the petitioner providing a bank guarantee and other charges as per Sec.129 and Rule 43 of 2017. The court refrained from determining if the detention resulted from human error or intentional action, leaving it to the adjudicating authority. The respondents were directed not to encash the bank guarantee until the issue was resolved, with the release subject to the outcome of the controversy determined by the adjudicating authority. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394128 The court ordered the release of the detained goods upon the petitioner providing a bank guarantee and other charges as per Sec.129 and Rule 43 of 2017. The court refrained from determining if the detention resulted from human error or intentional action, leaving it to the adjudicating authority. The respondents were directed not to encash the bank guarantee until the issue was resolved, with the release subject to the outcome of the controversy determined by the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394128