<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 31 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, deleting the penalties imposed under sections 272A(2)(k) and 271C of the Income Tax Act. The decisions were based on the absence of malafide intent in delayed filings of TDS statements and the requirement to declare the assessee as an assessee in default before imposing penalties for failure to deduct tax at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 31 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, deleting the penalties imposed under sections 272A(2)(k) and 271C of the Income Tax Act. The decisions were based on the absence of malafide intent in delayed filings of TDS statements and the requirement to declare the assessee as an assessee in default before imposing penalties for failure to deduct tax at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>