<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 20 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394113</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the membership fees as revenue expenditure based on business necessity and lack of enduring benefit or capital asset creation. The decision aligned with precedents emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital expenditure in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 20 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394113</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the membership fees as revenue expenditure based on business necessity and lack of enduring benefit or capital asset creation. The decision aligned with precedents emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital expenditure in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>