https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394111 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reexamine the issues of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained sundry creditors, and the unproved HDFC bank loan. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80C due to lack of supporting evidence. The appellant's contentions were considered, and specific directions were given for further examination by the AO based on additional evidence presented during the appeal. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:33:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394111 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reexamine the issues of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained sundry creditors, and the unproved HDFC bank loan. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80C due to lack of supporting evidence. The appellant's contentions were considered, and specific directions were given for further examination by the AO based on additional evidence presented during the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394111