<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 15 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of capital contributions in the hands of the partnership firm was unjustified. The firm adequately explained the entries, and based on legal precedents, the responsibility for tax implications shifted to the individual partner who explained the investments. The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the addition in the firm&#039;s hands was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:31:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 15 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of capital contributions in the hands of the partnership firm was unjustified. The firm adequately explained the entries, and based on legal precedents, the responsibility for tax implications shifted to the individual partner who explained the investments. The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the addition in the firm&#039;s hands was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>