<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 2 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394095</link>
    <description>In an NDPS prosecution involving alleged attempted export of commercial quantity Ketamine, the Court found a prima facie coordinated trafficking operation, supported by recovery of Ephedrine Hydrochloride and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride from linked premises, landlord testimony, emails and shipping documents connecting the applicant to the consignment. The applicant&#039;s section 67 statement was treated as available at the bail stage despite retraction. As the record did not rebut the prosecution case sufficiently to meet the rigours of section 37, the Court held that the statutory bail conditions were not satisfied and bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 2 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394095</link>
      <description>In an NDPS prosecution involving alleged attempted export of commercial quantity Ketamine, the Court found a prima facie coordinated trafficking operation, supported by recovery of Ephedrine Hydrochloride and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride from linked premises, landlord testimony, emails and shipping documents connecting the applicant to the consignment. The applicant&#039;s section 67 statement was treated as available at the bail stage despite retraction. As the record did not rebut the prosecution case sufficiently to meet the rigours of section 37, the Court held that the statutory bail conditions were not satisfied and bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>