<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1493 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Assessee&#039;s argument on the computation of deduction under Section 36(1)(viia)(c) but accepted the claim for a higher deduction under the proviso to the same section. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for consideration of the higher deduction claim, emphasizing the importance of determining correct tax liability in line with statutory provisions and recognizing the Assessee&#039;s entitlement to deductions under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1493 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Assessee&#039;s argument on the computation of deduction under Section 36(1)(viia)(c) but accepted the claim for a higher deduction under the proviso to the same section. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for consideration of the higher deduction claim, emphasizing the importance of determining correct tax liability in line with statutory provisions and recognizing the Assessee&#039;s entitlement to deductions under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>