<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21885</link>
    <description>The Court held that the expenditure incurred on the share issue for raising working capital was capital in nature, not revenue, based on the purpose and circumstances surrounding the share issue. The Court emphasized the need for a direct nexus between expenditure and business operations in determining its nature, as established in past judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:09:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21885</link>
      <description>The Court held that the expenditure incurred on the share issue for raising working capital was capital in nature, not revenue, based on the purpose and circumstances surrounding the share issue. The Court emphasized the need for a direct nexus between expenditure and business operations in determining its nature, as established in past judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>