<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1757 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions made by the AO under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the necessity of incriminating material for such additions in the absence of pending assessment proceedings. The Tribunal held that additions could only be made based on seized material and concluded that no valid additions could be made in this case due to the absence of incriminating evidence during the search and seizure proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1757 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions made by the AO under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the necessity of incriminating material for such additions in the absence of pending assessment proceedings. The Tribunal held that additions could only be made based on seized material and concluded that no valid additions could be made in this case due to the absence of incriminating evidence during the search and seizure proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>