<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 41 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21884</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is applicable to the refunded litre fee, deeming it as profits chargeable to income tax. The court emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;in respect of&quot; to include amounts previously allowed as deductions. The court distinguished a prior case where an unconstitutional levy led to a different outcome, stating that the refunded amount in this case was initially treated as an expenditure. Therefore, the court concluded that the refunded amounts are taxable under Section 41(1), answering the first question affirmatively and rendering the second question unnecessary for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:06:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 41 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21884</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is applicable to the refunded litre fee, deeming it as profits chargeable to income tax. The court emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;in respect of&quot; to include amounts previously allowed as deductions. The court distinguished a prior case where an unconstitutional levy led to a different outcome, stating that the refunded amount in this case was initially treated as an expenditure. Therefore, the court concluded that the refunded amounts are taxable under Section 41(1), answering the first question affirmatively and rendering the second question unnecessary for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>