<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1984 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, after considering the assessee&#039;s challenges in complying with TDS provisions due to low-qualified staff and reliance on consultants, deleted penalties imposed for delayed filing of TDS statements under Section 272A(2)(k) for all quarters of the relevant assessment year. Emphasizing the unjustified nature of penalties given the assessee&#039;s circumstances, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and concluded that the penalties were unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1984 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, after considering the assessee&#039;s challenges in complying with TDS provisions due to low-qualified staff and reliance on consultants, deleted penalties imposed for delayed filing of TDS statements under Section 272A(2)(k) for all quarters of the relevant assessment year. Emphasizing the unjustified nature of penalties given the assessee&#039;s circumstances, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and concluded that the penalties were unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>