<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 39 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21881</link>
    <description>Punjab and Haryana HC quashed a criminal complaint under the Income-tax Act and the IPC where the alleged concealment forming the sole basis of prosecution had already been deleted on merits by the appellate authority and the Tribunal. The competent tax authorities had accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for the disputed items and excluded those amounts from penalty proceedings, leaving the prosecution without a sustainable factual foundation. In these circumstances, the Court held that continuation of the complaint would serve no useful purpose and would amount to abuse of process, justifying exercise of inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:59:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 39 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21881</link>
      <description>Punjab and Haryana HC quashed a criminal complaint under the Income-tax Act and the IPC where the alleged concealment forming the sole basis of prosecution had already been deleted on merits by the appellate authority and the Tribunal. The competent tax authorities had accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for the disputed items and excluded those amounts from penalty proceedings, leaving the prosecution without a sustainable factual foundation. In these circumstances, the Court held that continuation of the complaint would serve no useful purpose and would amount to abuse of process, justifying exercise of inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>