<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of professional fees and interest expenses, along with the reclassification of certain income, due to the assessee&#039;s lack of business activity during the relevant year. However, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was overturned by the Tribunal due to procedural deficiencies in the penalty notice and the debatable nature of the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of professional fees and interest expenses, along with the reclassification of certain income, due to the assessee&#039;s lack of business activity during the relevant year. However, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was overturned by the Tribunal due to procedural deficiencies in the penalty notice and the debatable nature of the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>