<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1223 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both the deduction under Section 80IAB(4)(iii) and the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A. It affirmed that the Assessee qualified for the deduction and had enough own funds to cover tax-free investments, leading to the deletion of the interest expense disallowance. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the Assessee&#039;s interest expenses were for business purposes, not for making investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1223 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both the deduction under Section 80IAB(4)(iii) and the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A. It affirmed that the Assessee qualified for the deduction and had enough own funds to cover tax-free investments, leading to the deletion of the interest expense disallowance. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the Assessee&#039;s interest expenses were for business purposes, not for making investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>