<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1222 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394078</link>
    <description>The appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order for the Assessment Year 2010-11 was dismissed. The tax liability calculation for joint deposit holders, including interest payments under sections 201(1) and 201(1A), and non-submission of Form 15G and 15H, was upheld. The Tribunal found no error in the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the tax liability on joint deposit holders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1222 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394078</link>
      <description>The appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order for the Assessment Year 2010-11 was dismissed. The tax liability calculation for joint deposit holders, including interest payments under sections 201(1) and 201(1A), and non-submission of Form 15G and 15H, was upheld. The Tribunal found no error in the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the tax liability on joint deposit holders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>