<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1219 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394075</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the suspension of a Customs House agent&#039;s license due to misclassification of goods. The Court held that the suspension was invalid as it was based on an order of adjudication that had been set aside in the appeal process. The Court emphasized that the agent&#039;s classification of goods was appropriate, and the suspension was unjustified. The agent was permitted to resume operations, and pending renewal applications were directed to be promptly processed to avoid delays. Costs were awarded to the agent, and the Court ordered the provision of certified copies of the order to the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1219 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394075</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the suspension of a Customs House agent&#039;s license due to misclassification of goods. The Court held that the suspension was invalid as it was based on an order of adjudication that had been set aside in the appeal process. The Court emphasized that the agent&#039;s classification of goods was appropriate, and the suspension was unjustified. The agent was permitted to resume operations, and pending renewal applications were directed to be promptly processed to avoid delays. Costs were awarded to the agent, and the Court ordered the provision of certified copies of the order to the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>