<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1212 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394068</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the categorization of share application money as a financial debt but set aside the direction for refund and revival of the application due to the lack of established default. The tribunal provided an opportunity for the financial creditor to address the deficiencies and file a new application, keeping the question of limitation open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1212 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394068</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the categorization of share application money as a financial debt but set aside the direction for refund and revival of the application due to the lack of established default. The tribunal provided an opportunity for the financial creditor to address the deficiencies and file a new application, keeping the question of limitation open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>