<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1772 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287142</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 117 of Sales Goods and Service Tax due to their prematurity, as they were dependent on the outcome of other pending writ petitions. The petitioner was allowed to amend prayers in the other petitions to include the current ones, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1772 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287142</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 117 of Sales Goods and Service Tax due to their prematurity, as they were dependent on the outcome of other pending writ petitions. The petitioner was allowed to amend prayers in the other petitions to include the current ones, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>