<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the AO and allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming that IDCL and FCHL were valid comparables and excluding MOIAPL. The Tribunal upheld that a single comparable could be used to test the ALP of ITs, ensuring the assessee&#039;s transactions were within permissible limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:11:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the AO and allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming that IDCL and FCHL were valid comparables and excluding MOIAPL. The Tribunal upheld that a single comparable could be used to test the ALP of ITs, ensuring the assessee&#039;s transactions were within permissible limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>