<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 37 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21870</link>
    <description>The court held that the proportionate tax liability under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, was deductible in computing the net wealth. It also ruled that the right to receive compensation and interest did not constitute an asset for wealth-tax purposes until the consent decree was passed. The questions were answered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 37 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21870</link>
      <description>The court held that the proportionate tax liability under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, was deductible in computing the net wealth. It also ruled that the right to receive compensation and interest did not constitute an asset for wealth-tax purposes until the consent decree was passed. The questions were answered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>