https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287125 The Supreme Court considered whether the Bar Council of India has competence to prescribe pre-enrollment training, a pre-enrollment examination, or alternatively a post-enrollment examination for advocates. Because these questions raised issues of considerable importance for the legal profession, the Court referred them for authoritative determination by a five-Judge Constitution Bench. The reference covered the validity of pre-enrollment training under the Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995, the power to prescribe a pre-enrollment examination under the Advocates Act, 1961, and the alternative question of a post-enrollment examination under Section 49(1)(ah) of the Act. en-us Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:47:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287125 The Supreme Court considered whether the Bar Council of India has competence to prescribe pre-enrollment training, a pre-enrollment examination, or alternatively a post-enrollment examination for advocates. Because these questions raised issues of considerable importance for the legal profession, the Court referred them for authoritative determination by a five-Judge Constitution Bench. The reference covered the validity of pre-enrollment training under the Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995, the power to prescribe a pre-enrollment examination under the Advocates Act, 1961, and the alternative question of a post-enrollment examination under Section 49(1)(ah) of the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287125