https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287121 The Bar Council of India's pre-enrolment training rules were beyond the rule-making power conferred by the Advocates Act, 1961. Sections 7, 24(3)(d) and 49 authorised the Council only within its statutory functions and could not be used to impose an additional disability on persons already qualified for enrolment under Section 24(1). Parliament's deletion of the pre-enrolment training requirement and the related State rule-making power indicated that such training was not intended as a continuing condition for enrolment. The impugned rules therefore had no statutory basis and were ultra vires and invalid. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:10:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287121 The Bar Council of India's pre-enrolment training rules were beyond the rule-making power conferred by the Advocates Act, 1961. Sections 7, 24(3)(d) and 49 authorised the Council only within its statutory functions and could not be used to impose an additional disability on persons already qualified for enrolment under Section 24(1). Parliament's deletion of the pre-enrolment training requirement and the related State rule-making power indicated that such training was not intended as a continuing condition for enrolment. The impugned rules therefore had no statutory basis and were ultra vires and invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287121