<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1184 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of 3MM Stranded Ply wire, in a dispute over the valuation of goods sold to buyers. The central issue was whether the buyers could be classified as &quot;related persons,&quot; impacting the valuation method. The Tribunal found that while the buyers were interconnected, they did not meet the criteria of related persons under the law. Lack of evidence supporting a related person status and absence of mutual interest or fund flow between the parties led to the dismissal of the department&#039;s demand for higher valuation, setting aside the orders and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1184 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of 3MM Stranded Ply wire, in a dispute over the valuation of goods sold to buyers. The central issue was whether the buyers could be classified as &quot;related persons,&quot; impacting the valuation method. The Tribunal found that while the buyers were interconnected, they did not meet the criteria of related persons under the law. Lack of evidence supporting a related person status and absence of mutual interest or fund flow between the parties led to the dismissal of the department&#039;s demand for higher valuation, setting aside the orders and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>