<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1183 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a financial services provider, in a dispute regarding the inclusion of charges for dishonored post-dated cheques in the assessable value for service tax levy. The Tribunal ruled that the amounts collected from clients equaled the charges paid to the bank for dishonored cheques, making them reimbursable expenses. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal concluded that the demand against the appellant was not sustainable. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1183 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a financial services provider, in a dispute regarding the inclusion of charges for dishonored post-dated cheques in the assessable value for service tax levy. The Tribunal ruled that the amounts collected from clients equaled the charges paid to the bank for dishonored cheques, making them reimbursable expenses. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal concluded that the demand against the appellant was not sustainable. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>