<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1754 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287112</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed M/s BSNL, Begusarai, to adjust excess service tax paid against subsequent liabilities, citing Rule 6(4A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The Tribunal relied on precedents like Jubilant Organosys Ltd. and a recent CESTAT judgment, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; disapproval of the adjustment and confirming the appellant&#039;s right to such adjustments. The issue of taxability on collections from Village Telephone Booth was remanded for fresh adjudication, with the focus primarily on the adjustment of excess service tax payments. The Tribunal&#039;s decision affirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to adjust excess service tax payments in accordance with Rule 6(4A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1754 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287112</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed M/s BSNL, Begusarai, to adjust excess service tax paid against subsequent liabilities, citing Rule 6(4A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The Tribunal relied on precedents like Jubilant Organosys Ltd. and a recent CESTAT judgment, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; disapproval of the adjustment and confirming the appellant&#039;s right to such adjustments. The issue of taxability on collections from Village Telephone Booth was remanded for fresh adjudication, with the focus primarily on the adjustment of excess service tax payments. The Tribunal&#039;s decision affirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to adjust excess service tax payments in accordance with Rule 6(4A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>