<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1949 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to defaults in loan repayments. The Financial Creditor&#039;s claims were found credible, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and declaration of a moratorium. The Tribunal rejected the Corporate Debtor&#039;s challenges, including jurisdictional objections and allegations of malice, and emphasized adherence to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions. Requests for dismissal under Section 65 were denied, affirming the validity of the petition and the need for resolution proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1949 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to defaults in loan repayments. The Financial Creditor&#039;s claims were found credible, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and declaration of a moratorium. The Tribunal rejected the Corporate Debtor&#039;s challenges, including jurisdictional objections and allegations of malice, and emphasized adherence to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions. Requests for dismissal under Section 65 were denied, affirming the validity of the petition and the need for resolution proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>