<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1966 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287106</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s classification of the assessee as a financial company under the Interest Tax Act, 1974. It determined that the interest earned was taxable under the Act, rejecting the argument that it was from deposits rather than loans or advances due to lack of prior contention and evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the court ruled against the assessee, affirming liability for interest tax on the income earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1966 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287106</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s classification of the assessee as a financial company under the Interest Tax Act, 1974. It determined that the interest earned was taxable under the Act, rejecting the argument that it was from deposits rather than loans or advances due to lack of prior contention and evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the court ruled against the assessee, affirming liability for interest tax on the income earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>