<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the issues of bad debts and TDRs to the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) respectively for fresh consideration. The Tribunal allowed the deduction for expenditure on iron barricades, finding the authorities&#039; reasoning flawed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the issues of bad debts and TDRs to the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) respectively for fresh consideration. The Tribunal allowed the deduction for expenditure on iron barricades, finding the authorities&#039; reasoning flawed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>