<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 32 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21847</link>
    <description>A dispute over refusal of registration to a firm under the Income-tax Act examined whether the Tribunal could reject a second appeal without deciding it on merits and whether a referable question of law arose under section 256(2). The analysis states that, for section 256(2), the relevant enquiry was only whether the Tribunal&#039;s order gave rise to a question of law. It further notes that only the issue concerning rejection of the second appeal without merits consideration arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, while the remaining proposed questions were not shown to have been canvassed before the Tribunal and were declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 32 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21847</link>
      <description>A dispute over refusal of registration to a firm under the Income-tax Act examined whether the Tribunal could reject a second appeal without deciding it on merits and whether a referable question of law arose under section 256(2). The analysis states that, for section 256(2), the relevant enquiry was only whether the Tribunal&#039;s order gave rise to a question of law. It further notes that only the issue concerning rejection of the second appeal without merits consideration arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, while the remaining proposed questions were not shown to have been canvassed before the Tribunal and were declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>