<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 47 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21846</link>
    <description>Loans and borrowings were held to be excluded from capital employed for relief under section 80J because rule 19A(3) validly required borrowed monies and debts, including long-term borrowings, to be left out of the computation. That settled precedent made any direction to include such borrowings unsustainable. The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 47 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21846</link>
      <description>Loans and borrowings were held to be excluded from capital employed for relief under section 80J because rule 19A(3) validly required borrowed monies and debts, including long-term borrowings, to be left out of the computation. That settled precedent made any direction to include such borrowings unsustainable. The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>