<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1152 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394008</link>
    <description>The Advocates Act, 1961 was read to permit payment and regulation of enrolment fees on admission to the State roll, with Section 24(1)(f) recognising enrolment fee, Section 28 allowing State Bar Council rules on admission conditions and instalments subject to Bar Council of India approval, and Section 49 conferring wider rule-making power on fees under the Act. Reading these provisions harmoniously with the Advocates&#039; Welfare Fund Act, 2001, the enhanced enrolment fee was treated as within statutory authority and not shown to be unreasonable, unauthorized, or ultra vires. The challenge to the fee increase and supporting rules therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1152 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394008</link>
      <description>The Advocates Act, 1961 was read to permit payment and regulation of enrolment fees on admission to the State roll, with Section 24(1)(f) recognising enrolment fee, Section 28 allowing State Bar Council rules on admission conditions and instalments subject to Bar Council of India approval, and Section 49 conferring wider rule-making power on fees under the Act. Reading these provisions harmoniously with the Advocates&#039; Welfare Fund Act, 2001, the enhanced enrolment fee was treated as within statutory authority and not shown to be unreasonable, unauthorized, or ultra vires. The challenge to the fee increase and supporting rules therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>