https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287084 Arrest warrants issued to secure the petitioner's appearance in a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were treated as an excessive first-instance process, because arrest warrants should not ordinarily be used merely to summon an accused. Exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, the Court found the request to modify the mode of appearance justified and converted the arrest warrants into bailable warrants. The petition was accordingly disposed of by substituting bailable warrants for arrest warrants. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:05:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287084 Arrest warrants issued to secure the petitioner's appearance in a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were treated as an excessive first-instance process, because arrest warrants should not ordinarily be used merely to summon an accused. Exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, the Court found the request to modify the mode of appearance justified and converted the arrest warrants into bailable warrants. The petition was accordingly disposed of by substituting bailable warrants for arrest warrants. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287084