<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1793 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287082</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the plaintiffs&#039; application for interim relief, vacated the order restraining share transfer, and held the sale of pledged shares as valid under Depositories Act and SEBI Regulations. Plaintiffs were denied relief due to lack of diligence in prosecution, with balance of convenience favoring defendants. Further hearing was scheduled on the dismissal issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1793 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287082</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the plaintiffs&#039; application for interim relief, vacated the order restraining share transfer, and held the sale of pledged shares as valid under Depositories Act and SEBI Regulations. Plaintiffs were denied relief due to lack of diligence in prosecution, with balance of convenience favoring defendants. Further hearing was scheduled on the dismissal issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>