<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1589 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, finding it invalid for not addressing the pending appeal before the CIT(A) and failing to meet the criteria of being erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, actions taken by lower authorities to implement the quashed order were also deemed invalid. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and orders by the Assessing Officer to comply with the CIT&#039;s order were declared invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1589 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, finding it invalid for not addressing the pending appeal before the CIT(A) and failing to meet the criteria of being erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, actions taken by lower authorities to implement the quashed order were also deemed invalid. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and orders by the Assessing Officer to comply with the CIT&#039;s order were declared invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>