<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21832</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that certain payments made by the company to its employees were not &#039;perquisites&#039; for the purpose of disallowances under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74. This decision aligned with a prior judgment in the assessee&#039;s favor, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21832</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that certain payments made by the company to its employees were not &#039;perquisites&#039; for the purpose of disallowances under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74. This decision aligned with a prior judgment in the assessee&#039;s favor, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>