<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (8) TMI 120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287073</link>
    <description>The court held that the sums paid as damages and legal expenses were allowable deductions under Section 10 of the Act. The contracts entered into by the assessee were not illegal or against public policy, and the losses incurred were incidental to the business. The court answered the question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee, and awarded costs to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (8) TMI 120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287073</link>
      <description>The court held that the sums paid as damages and legal expenses were allowable deductions under Section 10 of the Act. The contracts entered into by the assessee were not illegal or against public policy, and the losses incurred were incidental to the business. The court answered the question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee, and awarded costs to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>