<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 171 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287072</link>
    <description>Prolonged pre-trial custody without commencement of trial or filing of a charge-sheet was treated as inconsistent with personal liberty and the requirement of prompt criminal . The Court stated that undertrials kept in custody for more than six months, where the case had not progressed, were entitled to release subject to the stated exception for specified offences. It also directed expeditious investigation and trial by fixing timelines for pending investigations and committed cases, with reporting back to ensure compliance. The decision emphasises that unconstitutional detention must be prevented through both release in appropriate cases and mandatory procedural speed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 171 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287072</link>
      <description>Prolonged pre-trial custody without commencement of trial or filing of a charge-sheet was treated as inconsistent with personal liberty and the requirement of prompt criminal . The Court stated that undertrials kept in custody for more than six months, where the case had not progressed, were entitled to release subject to the stated exception for specified offences. It also directed expeditious investigation and trial by fixing timelines for pending investigations and committed cases, with reporting back to ensure compliance. The decision emphasises that unconstitutional detention must be prevented through both release in appropriate cases and mandatory procedural speed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>