<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1128 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393984</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to lack of proper authorization for filing the application, as the authorization predated the Code and did not grant power to file before the tribunal. The tribunal emphasized the need for distinct authorization for such applications and highlighted the specific requirements under the Code for authorized persons to initiate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1128 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393984</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to lack of proper authorization for filing the application, as the authorization predated the Code and did not grant power to file before the tribunal. The tribunal emphasized the need for distinct authorization for such applications and highlighted the specific requirements under the Code for authorized persons to initiate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>