https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287068 The High Court of Rajasthan remanded the case back to CESTAT due to the cryptic nature of the impugned order, which did not consider relevant facts regarding clandestine removal of fabrics by the appellant. The appeal was disposed of, setting aside the order dated 7-11-2017, and directing CESTAT to reconsider the case with a focus on the evidence and reasons provided by both parties. en-us Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:49:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287068 The High Court of Rajasthan remanded the case back to CESTAT due to the cryptic nature of the impugned order, which did not consider relevant facts regarding clandestine removal of fabrics by the appellant. The appeal was disposed of, setting aside the order dated 7-11-2017, and directing CESTAT to reconsider the case with a focus on the evidence and reasons provided by both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287068