https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393974 The High Court upheld the Single Judge's decision, dismissing the writ appeal challenging the retention of seized money by the Income Tax Department. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue legal remedies through a revision petition before the Sessions Court and approach the Income Tax Department for release of the funds. Emphasizing the limitations of its jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court declined to issue any direction for immediate release of the money without proper adjudication by the relevant authority. The appellant was granted liberty to seek appropriate relief through the established legal channels. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:43:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393974 The High Court upheld the Single Judge's decision, dismissing the writ appeal challenging the retention of seized money by the Income Tax Department. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue legal remedies through a revision petition before the Sessions Court and approach the Income Tax Department for release of the funds. Emphasizing the limitations of its jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court declined to issue any direction for immediate release of the money without proper adjudication by the relevant authority. The appellant was granted liberty to seek appropriate relief through the established legal channels. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393974